Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Working accessibility prototype

More ways
to learn.
More ways
to connect.

An accessibility project exploring learning and communication support for Deaf, hard-of-hearing and non-speaking people, including sign-language users.

Beginning locally. Developing with care.

THE HUMAN SIDE OF TECHNOLOGY
A static portrait of the prototype’s two fictional 3D characters, a boy and a girl.
Different needs.
Shared possibilities.
Prototype visual characters · Static preview, not validated sign instruction.

OUR HUMANITARIAN PURPOSE

More opportunities to participate in learning.
More room for each person’s way of communicating.

01 — THE STARTING POINT

Access takes more
than one format.

A lesson can be available and still be difficult to access.

Some learners need clearer text, some use sign language, and some prefer visual or spoken support. Communication needs differ; no single format serves everyone.

Our humanitarian purpose is to explore how technology can support participation in learning and everyday communication, while respecting those differences.

02 — INSIDE THE PROTOTYPE

Practical tools.
An evolving project.

These capabilities are present in the working prototype. This website introduces the project; it does not provide access to the application.

Personal course space

Create, read and manage private courses and files.

Learning tools

Text simplification

Request simpler course text and key ideas alongside the original. AI suggestions require human review.

Reading support

French spoken reading

Listen to written course content where spoken support is useful, with playback and speed controls.

Spoken support

Visual demonstrations

Explore a limited set of visual resources and movement demonstrations, with source and language labels.

Limited coverage

Camera interaction

Try a small set of experimental gesture interactions, with a message to confirm.

Experimental

Hand and face tracking

View hand and facial movement tracking during optional camera experiments.

Experimental use

Articulated 3D playback

Observe selected movements with articulated characters. Linguistic validation remains planned.

Visual exploration

Local sign notebook

Keep a personal collection of sign videos and notes in the browser on the current device.

Personal resources

Tracking movements or replaying demonstrations does not establish that signed language has been understood.

03 — HOW IT MAY HELP

Different ways in.
More possibilities.

The project explores complementary ways to approach a lesson or a conversation. These are intended benefits, not measured educational outcomes.

Approach a lesson differently

Move between original text, simpler wording and spoken reading when useful.

Make room for visual support

Explore visual demonstrations alongside written learning materials.

Build on local knowledge

Develop future resources with sign-language users and local reviewers.

The longer-term ambition concerns African sign languages and locally used sign-language varieties. Expansion depends on separate local expertise and validation, not an assumption of one shared language.

04 — CLEAR LIMITS

An honest view
of where we are.

A working prototype is a starting point. Being clear about its limits is part of the work.

  • Continuous sign-language translation is not available in this prototype and has not been validated.
  • Local language coverage requires community validation.
  • Educational impact has not yet been independently measured.
  • Current camera interactions are experimental.
  • The system does not replace professional human interpreters.

Movement demonstrations should not be treated as validated language instruction.

05 — RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT

Local knowledge
should guide the work.

Deaf community co-leadership and local sign-language expertise are planned next steps, not partnerships already in place.

Community participation

Secure Deaf community co-leadership and local sign-language expertise before research collection or language-validation work.

Local linguistic review

Involve qualified local reviewers to assess meaning, variation and ambiguity. Preserve room for disagreement.

Consent and privacy

Establish governance and explicit, informed consent before recording. Recording, research use and publication require separate permissions.

Human review and correction

Keep human judgement central to responsible AI use. Make uncertainty clear and provide ways to review and correct outputs.

These commitments guide future development; they do not mean that a research programme or linguistic validation has already been completed.

06 — WHAT COMES NEXT

A careful path
forward.

Planned steps, dependent on participation, consent and the resources needed to do them well.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
  1. Local validation in Kinshasa

    Seek community co-leadership and local expertise to define and review the initial language scope.

  2. Usability testing

    Test whether the prototype is understandable and useful for people with different access needs.

  3. Community-reviewed resources

    Develop resources with documented local review and appropriate permissions.

  4. Broader sign-language coverage

    Explore additional languages and varieties only with relevant expertise and local validation.

  5. Accessibility expansion

    Improve access across devices, reading preferences and communication needs, informed by testing.

07 — PROJECT STATUS

Working prototype.

A functioning web prototype exists, with course tools and experimental visual interactions. That is an engineering starting point, not evidence of validated sign-language translation or independently measured educational impact.

This website is a standalone presentation. The application, its accounts and its data are not accessible from this page.

CONTACT

Let’s make room
for more possibilities.

Thoughtful conversations can shape what comes next.

A professional public contact address will be added before launch.

Kinshasa
Democratic Republic of the Congo